All  /  Men's Apparel  /  Shorts  /  Callaway  /  Opti-Stretch Classic Tech

Callaway Opti-Stretch Classic Tech Flat Front ShortsCallaway Opti-Stretch Classic Tech Shorts

5.0 ( 1 )
Configure Your Opti-Stretch Classic Tech Shorts

Features & Specs

Reviews

Q & A

Men's Callaway Opti-Stretch Classic Tech

Material : 95% Polyester / 5% Spandex

Description

A wide range of performance technology and classic looks make Callaway Men''s Golf Performance Flat Front Tech Shorts a fine choice for any golfer. This garments four-pocket design is complemented by Opti-Shield UPF 50 protection from the sun''s harmful ultraviolet rays, Opti-Dri to wick moisture from your skin, Opti-Stretch construction for maximum range of motion, and Easy Care fabric for no-fuss maintenance.

Features

  • Callaway Chevron Logo above Back Right Pocket
  • OptiStretch: interwoven layers of Spandex to ensure maximum range of motion so the garment moves with the golf swing
  • Expandable Waistband. OptiDri: transfers moisture away from the body to aid in evaporation
  • Flat Front with Belt Loops
  • Machine Wash Warm and tumble dry

Reviews

Nice shorts

Review by joe c, 3 months ago.

“These are nice lightweight comfortable shorts. There is a stretch waistband that allows for a correct fit without being too tight or loose. The inseam is a good length, I'm 6'1", that reaches just above my kneecap. The pockets are deep and the back pocket has an inside strip that holds your glove in place. ”

Did this help you? Yes ( 0 ) ··· No ( 0 ) ··· ( Report )
Report

Email verification required to report.

What do you think?

- +
Publish
* red indicates required field
* email for verification only
* plain text only

It will look like this :

Review by , 1 minute ago.

Did this help you? Yes ( 0 ) ··· No ( 0 ) ··· ( Report )

Q & A

Questions · 1
Login first to ask your question.

What is the inseam?

Joe C.     1 year ago     0 of 0 found this useful

Login to answer.
Submit

Best Answer

The inseam is approximately 9.75 inches.

Rudi Fann     1 year ago     0 of 0 found this useful